Sinopse: This book is the outcome of a research conducted in the Master of Laws (LL.M.) program at New York University in the academic year of 2014/2015. This research focused on Internet and Constitutional Law doctrine in Brazil and the United States. Primarily, its goal was to present solutions to three issues poorly debated in Brazilian legal studies through a comparative analysis with the United States law. All three of the topics discussed in this book were ignored by the Marco Civil da Internet regulation in Brazil. In the wake of Brazilian Internet law systematization, it is important to move forward from what the Marco Civil has in fact accomplished and focus on the issues that were left behind. In this spirit, this research addresses, in its first part, the Constitutional prohibition of anonymity in Brazil. This provision is prescribed in the same article that guarantees freedom of expression. Quite incongruently, the Brazilian Constitution also protects data and communications secrecy, and reporter’s privilege. There is, therefore, an important question as to whether – and to what extension – the Brazilian Constitution in fact bans online anonymity. In the second part of the book, the discussion focuses on the restrictions copyright law imposes on free speech online. In this part, the analysis is limited to a critical view of the United States legislation. The objections to the current American law and the propositions formulated by the end of the topic, however, are also useful when analyzing the issue under the Brazilian law. For that reason, they should also be considered in an eventual Brazilian regulation of the issue. Finally, the third part of this book tackles issues related to transnational due process of law. The last topic proposes solutions to overcome geographic obstacles that still impair online business across the globe. The Marco Civil da Internet was passed into law amid great cheers of victory from Internet rights advocates. Even though the [...]
