Sinopse: Traditional Media Distances Itself From Its Commitment To Plurality And Social Diversity, Even Though It Says Otherwise. The Construction Of Dissent Around Affirmative Action Exemplifies The Choice Of A White, Privileged Society. This Attitude Makes Us Question Why Race Is At Once Denied For The Implementation Of Public Policies- Vigor Of Social Mobility- And Confirmed For The Headlines Of Violence And Stereotype? Why The Non-incisive To Racial Quotas? How Do Social Actors (journalists And Non-journalists) Take Part In The Elaboration Of Quota Discourse? Why Do They Insist On Maintaining The Status Quo? It Is From These And Other Questions That We Seek To Understand The Symbolic Boundaries Established Between The Racial And The Social. Zilda Martins. Includes Bibliographical References (pages 169-176).
